Points Envy’s Caviar Death Match: Asiana vs. Cathay Pacific

Disclosure: We get a commission for links on the blog. You don’t have to use our links, but we’re very grateful when you do. American Express, Barclaycard, Capital One, Chase, Citibank and US Bank are Million Mile Secrets advertising partners. Opinions expressed here are the author's alone, and have not been reviewed, approved or endorsed by our partners. Here’s our Advertiser Disclosure.

Note: This post is satire and you shouldn’t follow any of Points Envy’s suggestions, nor should you break the law.  Any resemblance to the truth is purely coincidental.

The primary reason we invest all of our time in the points game is to fly first class, and one of the main reasons we enjoy first so much is the caviar.  Unfortunately, not all airlines’ caviars are created equal.  Fortunately, we at Points Envy have tried them all, and this week at Billion Mile Secrets we pit two of the best against each other in the fanciest cage match in the history of airline fine dining.

Before we get started, we’ll run through a quick primer for those of you less familiar with the champagne of the sea that is caviar.  When two fish find they truly love each other, they venture to a special nook of the sea to make sweet fish love and produce succulent pearls that, without proper intervention, would become more useless fish.  Thankfully, master seamen have learned to extract these eggs and sell them to airlines, who in turn serve them to worthy humans.

On our most recent trip to the Orient, we flew Asiana’s new first class suites on the outbound leg and returned in Cathay Pacific’s popular first class.  At first glance, these products might appear much the same, but the Korean and Chinese carriers would be offended if mixed up for one another.  They do much to distinguish their caviar services, and today we will judge them on these efforts.

The first consideration when eating caviar is presentation.  From the pictures below, you can see for yourself that Asiana serves its caviar à la tin, while Cathay’s version is served à la plate.  Unlike many food products, such as pork chops or ramen noodles, it is generally preferable one be served caviar in a container, so as to ascertain its authenticity.  Accordingly, Asiana gets the nod here.

Asiana Caviar       Cathay Pacific Caviar

Asiana on the left; Cathay Pacific on the right.

After reviewing the presentation, we like to take note of the caviar’s origin.  Asiana presented us with a paddlefish from New York, whereas Cathay gave us a “mystery meat” version without description.  Given the amount of nostalgia we still harbor for elementary school lunches (anyone else remember those chocolate milk pouches?), we much prefer the latter.

It is also important that the caviar course fit in comfortably with the overall menu.  On Asiana we opted for the Korean menu of bibimbap and the caviar was a perfect starter.  In the case of Cathay, the caviar course was the ideal beginning for our steak lunch.  Really, caviar pairs particularly well with any menu, so here we have a tie.

Another telling component of any caviar experience is the general mood.  This time around, we were feeling pretty down during our Asiana flight due to a recent 13.4% drop in the price of the single share of stock we own.  On the other hand, we were elated during the Cathay leg, as we were captivated and entertained by Tim Burton’s most-developed work to date, Frankenweenie.  We therefore give Cathay’s caviar the advantage here.

Finally, we always count the number of caviar eggs served, as it is a direct indication of how much the airline really cares.  The Asiana caviar came in at 214 eggs, while the Cathay serving contained 196 eggs.  Given that we redeemed 70,000 United miles for our Asiana flight and 67,500 American Airlines miles for our Cathay leg, this means a mile to egg ratio of around 327:1 for Asiana and 344:1 for Cathay, giving Asiana the slight edge.

Overall, we had a miserable time on both airlines for a variety of reasons unrelated to the caviar service. Although we forgot how either caviar course tasted because of our exhaustive sampling of the champagne, wine and spirits, if forced to pick a winner we’d probably choose Asiana.

* If you liked this post, why don’t you join the 25,000+ readers who have signed-up to receive free blog posts via email (only 1 email per day!) or in an RSS reader …because then you’ll never miss another update!

Editorial Disclaimer: Neither the responses below nor the editorial content on this page are provided or commissioned by the bank advertisers, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertisers. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of the bank advertisers. It is not the bank advertisers’ responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 responses to “Points Envy’s Caviar Death Match: Asiana vs. Cathay Pacific

  1. If it wasn’t for the disclaimer at the top, I would never have known that these are supposed to be funny.

  2. Fred, it’s a dry humor by which he’s subtly mocking the pretentiousness and vapidity of the way bloggers (undoubtedly including himself) often get energetically exercised over slight details, trifling edges, inconsequential affronts, pictures of minutiae, meaningless comparisons. To fully appreciate the humor here, you need to be a frequent reader of several blogs. I think it’s well done and good for some chuckles. It’s a regular Sunday feature; take it or leave it.

  3. Mile to egg ratio……….

  4. This is a flawed analysis. If you really want to see how they stack up, have them each buy a 787 put them at the top of hills on opposite sides of a valley, and have each airline’s first class crew push their plane down the hill to collide with the other.

  5. I wonder if G. Leff would appreciate Points Envy making fun of his beloved caviar. What’s next poking fun at the bubbly?

  6. Asia trip huh? Hmm, coincidence? We know who you are PE, come on! 🙂

  7. Well said, DaveS. I’m a coach flyer (even though I have tons of points) and don’t really understand the obsession with first class on many blogs (I did fly first class for one round trip, and concluded it was not worth the extra points). That’s probably why I enjoy PointsEnvy, but perhaps for some, it strike a little too close to home!

  8. Lufthansa does even a better job with the caviar….yummmm

  9. You also have to judge based on taste post-regurgitation once you’ve had one too many glasses of Krug. TMI? Love this post!

  10. “At first glance, these products might appear much the same, but the Korean and Chinese carriers would be offended if mixed up for one another.”
    Hmmm… Incorporate some subtle racism. Nice. Gotta hand it to the Euro-Americans. They’re good at that.

  11. Great post – much needed. There have a slew of posts recently with whining and complaining about the most amazing airline products in the world.

  12. I would rather have LH’s caviar service than Asiana and Korean’s.

  13. Well… to be honest, American Paddlefish caviar is pretty gross. Anyway, those 1oz jars of it retail for about $15.

  14. Lol I thought it was real – I should start reading from the first paragraph 🙂

  15. All caviar is not created equal. To go into the minuica of counting the number of eggs is lost if no one mentions the brand or the quality!